Showing posts with label Juliana Hatfield. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Juliana Hatfield. Show all posts

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Other People’s Resolutions

I didn’t make any radical New Year’s resolutions this year.  I’m just going to keep working on the ones I had started last year, which can be summed up in 5 words, literally- “Sleep, Write, Socialize, Exercise, Organize”.   I’ve made some headway on them.  For instance, I just donated my old car to a veteran’s charity and the existence of this post shows that I’ve done some writing.  Also, poker counts as a social activity because I do it with live people and we discuss other things as well, like Scrabble words, sports, TV commercials, and current events.  I’ve been doing a lot of poker “socializing” lately which is why the resolution I’m failing at the most is sleep.  As for other people, right about now is when they start to reconsider their resolutions and make some modifications to them (and by modifications, I mean they dump them altogether.)  Since they have given up on the goals they set for themselves, I thought I would step in and give them new goals.  I’m going make resolutions on their behalf because these people, or groups, don’t seem to be able to come up with any plans of action on their own.  This is what they need to focus on for the coming year.

10) For all webpage developers: No more massive click-thrus on your websites!  If I go to your site because it has something cool on it, I want to see that cool thing right away.  I don’t want to get carpal tunnel syndrome by having to click through page after page where I see just one picture and two sentences per webpage before having to click on the next page and wait for it to load.  For instance, this site ( http://liveiseedeadpeoples.tumblr.com/  ) has an interesting idea- pictures of classic album covers with the deceased artists removed from the covers.  It is an unusual artistic statement that makes you reconsider the album in a whole new perspective.  When I go there though, there is no description as to what the page is about nor do I have any idea about how many pages there might be or even if there are any more examples of the concept.  Then I suddenly come to an end and think “That was neat, but kind of irritating to get through.  And where was the Traveling Wilbury’s revamped album cover?”
Then I go to another site, like this one ( http://www.spin.com/articles/spins-50-best-albums-2011 ) which has Spin Magazine’s listing of their 50 best albums of 2011. Since I’m a music junkie and they are a professional music magazine, I want to see what they thought was the year’s best stuff.  So I click on the link and it takes me to several pictures of covers from albums like Britney Spears and The Foo Fighters along with some text talking about what made that particular album great. So I scan through that page and then click to go to the next page.  It takes 20 or 30 seconds to load up and then I have 5 more albums displayed.  This means if I want to see all 50, I’ll have to click on ten different pages and wait 30 seconds per page just for it to load before I can start reading.  After the third page, I figured my time was better spent on doing something else so I abandoned the website.
 
So that’s why this resolution is needed.  Just show me the whole list at once!  If I wanted to click a lot of things repeatedly, I’d be playing a video game.  Put everything on the same page.  That’s actually part of what makes it a list. If you spread it out over lots of pages, it becomes a book.  If I can actually read a physical book or magazine quicker than the electronic version, what is my benefit for investing the time in the electronic version?  Plus, if it is displayed all on one page, I can start reading the top part while the remainder of the page loads.

9) To all marketing departments and/or entertainment media outlets:  Stop hyping mediocre stuff!  Just because a book or a movie doesn’t suck doesn’t mean it is fantastic.  It just means it doesn’t suck.  Something that is well-made and entertaining is not a masterpiece so stop pretending it is and stop trying to convince me that I must buy, watch, hear or consume this product.  For example, the movie “Drive” had Ryan Gosling playing a professional stunt driver who moonlights as a wheel man for criminals in need of a driver.  In his down time, he tinkers with weapons and falls in love with the neighbor in the next apartment.  Of course, things go wrong and his life gets upended.  It’s a decent movie, characterized by good performances and solid directing but it is still just a high-end, artsy rehash of “The Transporter”.  I cannot fathom how critics are pushing it as “Oscar-worthy” or as one of the best pictures of the year.  It is a yeomen accomplishment.

Yes, Albert Brooks has a nice lively turn as a villain, but Ryan Gosling is in his usual half-asleep mode and Carey Mulligan remains as talented and unsexy as ever.  The violent scenes are well executed but predictable along with the rest of the script. So I watched and liked the movie but it is nowhere near my top 20 for the year.  Critics- please stop falling all over yourself just because you came across something that didn’t suck for once.  That is supposed to be the norm.  There are enough good things out there to push on people so don’t test their patience with stuff like Drive, Jesse J, Skrillex, the Hollywood remake of Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, any book in the Twilight series and so on and on.

8) Banks- Don’t charge me for the privilege of accessing my own money.  I have money.  Not loads of it, but enough that I can’t keep it all in my wallet, not even if it was all in hundreds (unless by wallet I meant purse.)  I have to put some of it in the bank.    I have been conditioned by society and my parents and force of habit to stash it there.  When you get money, you are taught to put it in the bank, to save it and invest it.  Supposedly I will earn interest on my money by doing so and it is safer in a bank than it is in a can in the freezer.  Maybe I could put it in a book in my house since no one reads books these days and crooks probably wouldn’t bother to look through them, but I feel better with it behind big, heavy vault doors.  Yeah, I know nowadays it isn’t actually in the safe but being in the financial “cloud” is just as good- someone else is responsible for it and crooks can’t touch it.  Unless those crooks also own the bank, which could never happen, right?

The problem though is that I now have to pay the bank to be able to use my own money.  Let’s say I’m going out to dinner with friends and I want some cash.  If I go to the ATM, I have to pay a service fee to get my own money from the bank.  You might say there is only a fee if I don’t use my own bank’s ATM but why should that matter?  My money is in the cloud.  It’s not like the money is being shipped back and forth between the banks.  Why should it cost money to access it at a different bank?  The cost for them to maintain their ATM is the same as my bank’s ATM costs and it isn’t really determined by the incremental cost.  The people who use my bank should offset the times when I use their bank and have a net zero usage effect.  Plus, even if I only use my bank branches exclusively, it still costs me because the bank charges a $1 a month fee for a check/ATM card. 

In the olden days (the 1980’s and earlier, i.e. pre-Madonna), when my money was sitting in a bank, the bank gave me interest for it.  They would loan it out to people so those people could buy a car or a house or start a business.  My money was backed by tangible assets so the bank had low risk and they were happy to share their success with me.  I got a decent interest rate, something with a number in front of the decimal point instead of behind it.  As banks were deregulated, they started moving into other financial areas, ones that came with a bit more risk because what they were investing my money in was an intangible product.  Because of that extra risk and the danger of losing my money, the banks could no longer afford to give me much interest because that would cut into their profits.  Instead, I had to give them my money and only expect to get back basically that same amount.  I guess that is still okay, because isn’t there that saying “Higher risk means lower return”? 

Besides, it’s not like the banking and financial industries are posting record profits so why would I expect to get anything back for letting them use my money to generate income for themselves?  Goldman Sachs is struggling to make enough money to cover their annual bonuses.  (Yes, I’m being facetious because I think the banking industry is almost as big of a scam as the catering industry.)  On top of that, if I don’t have enough money in the bank, I might have to pay an under-the-minimum- balance fee.  Who determines how much money is too little?  I didn’t realize it wasn’t worth the bank’s time and energy to have people give them money.  I would be thrilled if people walked up to me and said “Here’s some money.  Can you hang on to this for me for a couple years, interest free?”

7) Stop giving away the secrets, surprises and twist endings of things.  I used to think that everyone loved a surprise.  Isn’t that why you jump out of hiding and yell “Surprise” when the birthday boy walks in to a surprise party?  I thought the whole reason for wrapping Christmas presents before putting them under the tree was so people didn’t know what they were getting for their gifts.  They would get a (hopefully) pleasant surprise when they gently unwrapped and/or tore off the paper to see what was underneath.  The reason I’m saying these things in the past tense is because all the evidence seem to point to the contrary, like I need to change this mindset.  These days, when I’m at the theatre seeing a movie and a preview comes on for an upcoming movie, after those two preview minutes I know the whole plot of the upcoming movie.  If it is a mystery, thriller or drama I know all twist endings and surprising revelations.  If it is a comedy, I have heard all the really good jokes.  If it is an action movie, I’ve seen all the fight scenes and explosions from multiple angles, plus I’ve heard the “hoping to become a pop-culture catchphrase” at least twice.

I want to be entertained and part of that requires that I don’t know exactly what will happen.  I almost never flip to the end of a book to see what happens.  The only time I do so is when I’m worried my favorite character is about to die.  Would you pay $100 to go to a football game if you knew the final score ahead of time, and you had already seen all the highlights and big plays on ESPN?   Would you even watch it on TV for free?  Probably not.  The whole fun of sporting events is that anything can happen.  The Giants can improbably, impossibly, win the Super Bowl against the Patriots on an unbelievable drive in the final seconds of the game.  Then they can do it once again three years later against the still-favored Patriots.   D.C. United can win the first MLS championship game on a wild overtime goal.   Michael Jordan can push off from Bryon Russell of the Utah Jazz to hit a three-pointer that wins the Bulls another championship.  You want to see these things happen.  You don’t want to know the outcome ahead of time. 

So why do television shows end an episode with a cliffhanger, like someone getting shot or some other dramatic turn of events, and then thirty seconds later show scenes from next week’s episode that makes it clear that everything worked out fine?  You’ve just deflated my dramatic tension.  Instead of being on pins and needles until next week to see if Rick Castle got back together with his ex-wife or if Kate Beckett really is dead, I immediately see a scene of them laughing over a joke while investigating next week’s murder.  The suspense and gravitas is gone.  Back in the old days, although I always knew Jack Bauer wouldn’t be killed, at least not until the final season, I didn’t know how he would escape his captors or what unhinged torture scheme or daring plan he had in mind.  I was surprised! 

This next paragraph gives away a vital plot point so skip this if you don’t want to see a spoiler for The Hunger Games books.  I was enthralled with the book, a supposedly young adult mélange of the television show “Survivor” and the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, where kids are forced to fight and kill each other to become the sole survivor of that year’s game.  (Have you noticed how the most entertaining books these days are Y.A. books?)  About halfway through the book, I knew I would want to read the next one in the trilogy.  I was pretty sure that the heroine, Katniss, would win because she appears in all three books but I couldn’t figure out how she could kill Peeta, the boy from her town who helped her family survive after Katniss’ father died.  As I’m reserving the second book from the library, I see a blurb about it that starts with this sentence “After winning the Hunger Games, Katniss and Peeta…”.  What the hell?  They both win?  You just ruined a heck of a lot of the story’s dramatic arc!  Now I know a lot of her angst in the last half of the book is unfounded and the plot twists have been deflated.  I didn’t need to know that Peeta lived as well.   When I reserved the third book, Mockingjay, I made sure to hold my hand up in front of the description part in case the library tried to ruin it for me again.  I’m actually one of the few people I know who likes having movie adaptions of books take small liberties with the plot because it means I will get some surprises from the movie even though I’ve already read the book.

6) Everything in life is NOT free so start paying for things!  Let me tell you a little parable.  There is this kid who is good at playing guitar and writing songs so he decides he wants to be a musician when he grows up.  During high school, he plays in the school band to practice his musical skills.  On the weekends he jams with his bandmates, sometimes getting lucky and having the chance to play some gigs at local clubs where they earn $50 each for the show.  After graduating, the kid works as a bartender so he can play shows at night and still have a regular job.  In order to generate some buzz for the band, he records a couple of his original songs on his computer and posts them to his website.  One of the band’s fans makes a video of one of their shows and posts it on YouTube.   Several thousand people download the songs and watch the videos and they post really positive comments on the band’s website.   Their shows generate a small but loyal following so they have a steady gig on Wednesday and Thursday nights at a local club and they now earn $100 each.  Occasionally, they play shows in other cities but it is tough moving around all the gear and coordinating the band member’s schedules and the cost of gas and lodging can eat into their earnings.  They decide to sell t-shirts at their show to up their revenue at each show so they pay a guy $3,000 to produce their shirts. 

Because of the economy, the guy’s business tanks and he can’t pay them back their money.  About the same time, the kid’s girlfriend gets pregnant.  He’s happy about this because he’d always wanted to be a father.  The problem is that it will take a lot more money to properly take care of the baby.  The couple can’t afford day care so the mom will have to stay home and take care of the baby.   The kid, now an adult father, wants to keep playing and being a musician but he also wants to take care of his baby and have a place to live and save some money for the future.  How will he do this?  He doesn’t get paid by people downloading his songs for free from his website.  YouTube doesn’t pay him anything either.  It generates publicity but not enough to get a record deal; besides, record companies are on the way out.  Musicians are now expected to everything on their own.  D.I.Y. and all that. 

The club shows don’t pay enough to do more than cover rent and food and their fan base isn’t big enough to beat out the more famous acts when trying to book shows at the better venues.  He is going to have to invest some money to get the band to the next level but he never made enough money to be able to do that.  There is no way a bank will loan money to someone who’s business plan is “to be a rock star”.  The audition line at American Idol is impossibly wrong.  So how long do you think this guy will keep trying to make a living as a musician?  Probably not very long.  At some point in the equation, money needs to come into play. 

That’s what record companies used to be able to do- spend money on long shots because the ones that succeed will pay for the failures.  That’s how you end up with Modest Mouse and Skinny Puppy.  Britney Spears, Miley Cyrus, Justin Beiber and all those other mass consumption pop acts fund the misfits, the fringe acts and all the really good bands that don’t find their groove until their third or fourth album.  When the record label model collapses, musicians will be left to their own devices.  Not everyone will survive long enough to get the attention and money they need to produce the songs you love.   Less good music will get made and you will have a harder time finding it. 

You need to start paying for what you like.  Downloading and file sharing will not put money in a musician’s pocket and he will soon cease to be a musician.  He’ll become an accountant or an RV salesman.  Haven’t you ever seen an episode of Behind The Music or Bands Reunited?  People stop playing music because they stop getting paid for it.  It is not because they don’t like doing it anymore.  They need to eat.  I love Pandora but I have a hard time seeing how anyone other than the big name acts can make money from it.  The one that really scares me though is Spotify.  It is an incredible site- I can play millions of songs whenever I like.  It’s like having a radio that I can program myself so I hear exactly what I want whenever I want.  Best of all, it is free to do this!  Now if I can hear whatever I want whenever I want, why would I need to buy it?  Digitally or otherwise? 
 It is just as easy to click on my Kylie Minogue playlist on Spotify as it is to pull up the tracks I bought digitally from Amazon.  The ease of use is the same but one costs me money so why would I pick the one that I have to pay for?  If everyone starts using it, then Lana Del Ray will never get rich because people will do what I did this afternoon- listen to the “album” and see if it lives up to the hype/backlash/additional hype (since no one has yet read resolution # 9 ).  Outcome- I like it but don’t think I will buy it, so she gets no money from me.  Multiply that by the entire world, and Lana needs to find some other way to pay her rent.  Maybe modeling, since she is absolutely gorgeous.  That’s one of the reasons I still buy actual, physical CDs- I know that it puts money in the pockets of my favorite artists and they can continue making music I want to hear without having to resort to licensing songs to Katherine Hiegl movies.

This is the same thing that is happening in the newspaper and magazine industry.  All the content is online now for free so no one wants to buy a physical version.   Although I kind of disagree with that thought process, I certainly understand it.  The problem is that someone has to generate that content.  Someone has to write it; occasionally someone edits and proofreads it before it gets posted to a website that an IT person maintains.  Another person sells ad space on the website and collects the money for that and a purchasing department buys new computers servers and security software when the site needs to be upgraded.  I guarantee you that the people at Huffington Post are not volunteering their time and efforts for free.  They are getting paid for it and in a lot of cases, they might be making more than the originators of the content they repost.  If you are going to argue that advertising covers the expenses, then tell me what are the last five ads you clicked on when checking out a website? 

You don’t know because you don’t click on sidebar ads and you hardly glance at banner ads or pop-ups. You delete emails that you think are spam and you have stopped subscribing to Groupon and Living Social because they send you too many things.  If you don’t check out ads, then advertisers will stop paying to display their ads.  Without ads, how will websites generate enough money to pay for content?  How will television programs keep getting made if you watch shows commercial free on your DVR or Hulu and you no longer buy the shows on DVD?  Are the actors and cameramen going to work for free?  No.  Movie studios will have to stop making movies because people are not going to movie theatres as much.  They are staying home to stream them from Netflix instead and they make their own popcorn too.  The money Netflix pays studios can’t possible cover the billions of dollars they are used to making from movie theatres.  You only want to pay $12 a month to Netflix (remember how you got really irate when they hiked prices up to $16?) but do you think that will be enough to cover the $200 million (yes, $200 MILLION) budget for Transformers 4?   I don’t think so.  And that is just one movie.  No one wants to watch Transformers 4 once, much less over and over and over.  You have to make more movies so you need to spend another $150 million for Men In Black 3, $250 million for Avatar 2 and $75 million for Hangover 3 and so on and so on.  (Sequels are the most likely movies to turn a profit so that is what studios will produce.)  Do you think Netflix and iTunes and cable’s OnDemand programs can cover those costs?  Nope, not if you expect to pay next to nothing for the content, so movie studios will close up shop rather than lose money.  Count on it.    

Now let’s step away from the entertainment industry for a minute in case you are thinking they are just greedy moneygrubbers.  Let’s look at a different industry instead- the restaurant business.  You know how you criticize chain restaurants for being predictable and cookie cutter?   Well, they do that because it keeps costs down and allows for economies of scale.  That family run restaurant down the street that you like so much?  It shut down last month because you only went there twice a year, on special occasions.  It costs too much to buy food and maintain a staff for a place that only gets visited twice a year.  If it tries to reduce expenses by joining a food buying conglomerate and standardizing advertising and payroll processes and so forth, then they become a chain and you don’t even go there twice a year.  That’s why people need to start paying for things they like.  Yes, free is nicer but if it is free for too long, eventually it won’t exist anymore.  Buy music, books and magazines.  Eat out, attend live theatre and concerts.  Buy concessions at the movie theatre.  Donate to the library.  Vote for your taxes to go to charities and arts programs and school systems.  Do it before it is too late.

5) Stop writing checks in the grocery store!  If you want to talk about an archaic system that should actually disappear, look at the check book.  Why do you need to write a check?  Use your check card.  It has all the same advantages of making out a check (direct withdrawal of funds, no high interest rates, late payment fees or credit limits) and none of the limitations (time spent writing checks, logging the checks, balancing your account, carrying around a checkbook).  Or if that is too complicated for you to wrap your mind around, then at the very least start making out the check while the cashier is scanning your stuff.  You don’t need to wait to hear the total for the sale before getting started on this laborious process.  Is the date going to change between now and the time the cashier is finished?  Is the name of the store going to change?  No!  Just fill that stuff out now, sign your name and when the 16-year old kid tells you the balance due, write it in the dollar field and hand him the check along with your identification that you have already retrieved from your wallet.  Don’t you dare wait until the cashier is all done before you drag out a ratty checkbook and start looking for a pen.  And for heaven’s sake, hold out your food stamps ahead of time so I know not to get in your line.

4) Synchronize!  Originally, this one was going to be “Use your signal when driving!” but I know you all are likely tired of hearing me rant about people who don’t know their cars come equipped with a method of letting me know when they are going to swerve suddenly into my lane.  Or make a turn at a four-way intersection or when cutting in front of me to make a right turn from the left lane.  So I won’t talk about these things anymore.  Instead, I will ask the faceless, data-mining, privacy-invading Big Brother that people are so paranoid about to get finally get its act together and create some convergence.  So far I haven’t seen much of anything to prove this fear is a reality and I have actually been wanting this to happen.  I don’t mind having my consumer habits and personal information in some central database if it means it will make things less annoying for me. 

I want Amazon to know that I already bought the Party Down DVDs from Best Buy and to please stop recommending them to me just because I bought Veronica Mars DVDs from them.  I want Facebook to know that although I love played Zynga Poker and Words With Friends, I don’t want to play Cityville or Hangman.  They can remove that prompt from my notifications and suggested sites.   I like Lawrence Block, Steve Martin and Martha Grimes books and I want their publishers to notify every time they put out a new one.  I don’t want to have to troll a website or read a review to know that it has come out.  I will buy it regardless- just tell me it exists.  In the past, I have actually signed up at an artist’s website or on a retailer’s alert system for the express purpose of being informed when there is a new product they can ask me to buy.  Only once have I gotten an email telling me I should go purchase this item that is hot off the presses.  Juliana Hatfield is the only one to keep me in the loop about what she is selling and she is the sole employee of her business.  How can multi-billion dollar companies not manage their potential customer database better than one anti-social indie songwriter? 

This is why I don’t buy into the hysteria about the government tracking my every move.  No one is matching my library book rental patterns against my grocery store purchases and my cell phone location to see if I am a terrorist threat.  Big businesses are not buying my purchasing data to compile a profile of what I respond to.  If they were, they would know I’m not interested in growing my penis size, buying a Ford truck or seeing the latest Tyler Perry movie.  I would not get flyers in the mail for storm drain cleaning, church announcements or day care services.  TV shows would only run ads for things that appeal to me because the “black box” would know what I like.  There would be no ads for tampons because the box would know that my grocery buying has never contained such a purchase.  I would not see any ads for diapers because I have no kids.  I wouldn’t see class action lawsuit ads because they would know I was never prescribed the medication they are filing a lawsuit over. 

I would see the e-Trade baby ads though because those are hilarious and I do like to make sure my money is secure.  I would see the iPhone ads because I’ve bought songs featured in the ads (Grouplove’s Tongue Tied even made it on my 2011 Year In Review mix CD) and I also would see ads for movies similar to those I’ve watched before.  The online editions of USA Today and the Washington Post would know which articles to display for me and the comics section would only that show those cartoons that are funny- so yes to Dilbert, Speed Bumps, Pearls Before Swine and Non Sequitur and no to Mutts, Doonesbury and Six Chix.  It would make my life so much easier if corporate America really did know everything about me.
Assuming that this won’t suddenly happen, the least they could do is give me portability of the things I actually am buying from them.  For instance, I subscribe to cable television.  I watch quite a few shows but I can’t watch them simultaneously.  Some things need to be time-shifted.  My cable system lets me watch some shows on demand the next day but only some shows.  The service is only available for NBC and ABC so I can catch up on Community or Cougar Town if I don’t happen to be home or am watching something else during that time slot.  I can’t see Fox or CBS though which is why I’m no longer a viewer of NCIS: LA or American Idol.  Maybe I could watch them on Hulu or Netflix or Fox’s website but why would I want to watch something on my computers 12-inch screen when I’m used to looking at it on a 32-inch television screen?  Plus if I’m paying for cable and could have watched the show that way, why do I need to also pay for Netflix streaming services if I want to watch it later on?  I paid for a delivery system for the shows so I should be able to watch them when I want to, on the system I prefer.  If you force me to choose, then I will choose and your audience will shrink. 

I have bought a lot of CDs but when I want to listen to them, I might not be at home.  Why do I need to rip them to my computer so I can upload them to iTunes so I can sync them to my phone?  One purchase should carry across all mediums.  If I buy a book, I should be able to look at it on my phone, on my computer and on my television screen.  A picture should be viewable within any program and a song should be playable on any console- I shouldn’t have to figure out whether something is a jpeg, a bitmap, a gif, wav or an mp3 file.  They should all be the same.  Yes, I know why they aren’t- different companies developed them and they are proprietary products- but with any technology, people should get together and come up with standards.  Make the same power plug for Android and iPhones and Kindles and Nooks.  Don’t sell me different plugs for each device.  Make the memory cards for cameras work with any company’s camera.  Imagine how complicated life would be if electrical sockets all had different prongs.  If your hair dryer was a four-flat-prong plug and your computer was a two-round-prong plug and your vacuum cleaner used a 3 square pegs to plug in?  Every house could have different outlets and when you moved you would have to buy all new appliances or adaptor plugs for everything.  That would be a mess, wouldn’t it?  It doesn’t happen though because electrical outlets are standardized.  If it can be done for that, why not other things?  Facebook would integrate all things I want a social media site to do.  No mucking about with MySpace or Friendster or Salmon or Google Plus.  Flickr and Snapfish and Shutterfly wouldn’t exist as a stand-alone entity.  They’d be a part of the giant social site that did everything.  There should never have been a Beta versus VHS stand-off.  No Mac versus PC or CD versus DAT.  One thing to rule them all.

3) Come up with an actual agenda for Occupy Wall Street, Occupy DC, Occupy The Highway, and Occupy Denver/Atlanta/Las Vegas/Portland/Richmond/ Philadelphia/Nashville/Seattle/Anchorage (Really, Anchorage?  Why?) so I can decide whether to care about your “movement.”  I too am against corporate greed, political corruption, high unemployment and the growing gap between the rich and the rest of us 99% but what is your solution?  How should we fix things?  You have no agenda that presents a way to address these problems.  If a building is on fire, you don’t hold a protest in front of the burning building because you are deeply concerned about the fact that it is on fire and people’s lives and property are in danger.  You send over a freaking fire truck to put out the fire! 

What should we be doing to fix these issues?  Have you created a grass roots voter campaign to urge voters to pressure their Congressional representatives to enact specific laws to remedy these situations?  Have you asked the 1% celebrities that stop by the camps to use the media to address your concerns?  Have you sent newspapers and other media outlets some kind of manifesto or a list of actions you are taking?  No.  Right now you are just annoying me, inconveniencing me and wasting my tax dollars by requiring extra police presence and sanitation efforts.  In some instances, you have even broken the law and performed terrorist acts, like throwing smoke bombs at the White House.  That’s the way to get yourself shot, not to engender sympathy and support.  And stop with the ridiculous hand gestures.  If you want to vote on something, raise your hand either for or against it.  Better yet, count paper ballots.  That’s how a democracy works.  Wiggling your fingers is not voting.  It’s how fish swim around in the ocean.

2) Give me real discourse and real solutions this election cycle.  I want to know about the issues and how you plan to fix things, in detail.  I don’t want sound bites.  Nein Nein Nein to sound bites and generalities.  Educate me!  I too am worried about the collapse of our economy, the global financial meltdown, the resurrection of Russia, terrorism, disappearing retirement benefits and pension plans, healthcare costs, unemployment, government corruption, the influence of lobbying, national debt, engaging in multiple foreign wars, pollution, dependency on foreign oil supplies, etc…etc… etc….  And don’t let me hear the words “change”, “hope” or “liberal/conservative” this time around.  Let me hear facts and information and solutions instead of platitudes.  The personal attacks can stop too.  I don’t care if so and so cheated on their wife.  How is their fiscal policy?  As long as they haven’t done anything illegal (like dodging taxes, taking bribes, suppressing evidence, lying to Congress), I don’t care who they screw or who donates to their campaign. 

Limiting the viable candidates only to people who were never divorced, never made a mistake, never changed their mind, aren’t too rich or too poor, aren’t overly passionate and excited (a la’ Howard Dean), follow the “proper” religion and so forth is the same as limiting the election to those who prove their soundness to vote by passing a literacy test, own land and are white men.  Elections need to be about the issues and finding solutions to the problems, not about pointing fingers at who did what and who mangled a sentence in a hilarious and embarrassing way.  Some people feel Barack Obama is doing a great job and he is a rich, black, Muslim lawyer who held his first elective office for 100 days before running for president and he is friends with acknowledged radicalists (i.e. domestic terrorists).  He won the election because he convinced voters that he had a better grasp of the issues than his opponent did (and because he used the word “Hope” a lot.)  Take a lesson from that victory.  Solutions should lead the campaigns and I want to hear what those solutions are, in terms of real actions rather than generalities.  For instance, I want to know why Ron Paul thinks we should readopt the gold standard.  That will inform my decision a lot more than knowing he smoked pot in college. 

1) A final resolution, meant for everyone- Be nice to people!  Yeah, maybe that sounds a bit Bill & Ted-ish (“Be excellent to one another!”) but why not do it?  Do you know how many problems would disappear if people just acted nicer to each other?  First of all, there would be no more murder or war because homicide is the most complete opposite of being nice.  Then, stepping down a few levels in intensity, you would reduce greed and corruption because being nice to someone implies that you won’t steal their life’s savings in a pyramid scheme or embezzle company assets from stockholders.  You wouldn’t need the FDA or EPA because companies would take it upon themselves not to do anything to harm consumers or the environment.  There would be fewer traffic accidents because people wouldn’t cut off other drivers or drive in a reckless fashion (Yeah, I managed to get in a dig about traffic!) 

Hot girls would shoot down ugly people and geeks like me gently, saying something like, “That is so sweet of you.  I’m sorry that I don’t reciprocate your interest but it’s nice of you to flatter me with your attention.  I want to buy you a drink so we can talk for a few minutes before I go home with that handsome jock/underwear model over there.”  In stores and public areas, people would be alert to and considerate of the others around them, rather than stopping at the top of escalators, cutting to the front of bathroom lines and letting their kid tear apart the store.  They would not create a bright light in a dark theatre by text messaging and distracting everyone sitting near them, ruining the fantasy being spun onscreen.   They would not slack off at work and make others cover for them.  They would not have their boyfriend kneecap an opponent before a big skating competition.   There would never be a hit-and-run accident.  No one would abuse a pet. 
Don’t all these things sound wonderful?  Imagine if they really happened.  It’s possible, but it all starts with you.  Yes, and me too although I think you are more of the problem then me.  I’m not a rich lobbyist trying to get Congress to approve legislation allowing corporations to dump toxic waste in the last refuge of the sparkly-eyed newt in a pond next to the house of a poor factory worker who was laid off because the CEO of his company embezzled all the money in the pension fund and then sold the company to a pharmacology conglomerate who bought it just so they could get the patents to a technological breakthrough that they’ll exploit to decimate their competition and create a monopoly that charges exorbitant prices for a life-saving drug.      

So there you have it.  Some suggestions for people to follow in order to start the new year off on the right foot.  That doesn’t sound too complicated, does it?  New Year’s resolutions always turn out really well and make a world of difference pretty quickly.   If you promise to do your part, I’ll get to work on mine.  Since they are obviously so easy to accomplish, maybe I’ll even add some more, like learn to play guitar, grow hair, become a professional writer, marry Marisa Tomei and start a company that turns plastic and Styrofoam into grass seed.  That sounds like a great plan.  This is going to be a great year!

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The Year In Music (2009)

When the Internet was going mainstream and people started blogging all the time, everyone was touting how it was the new model for music. Forget record labels. Ordinary people could create buzz for a favorite artist on their personal blog or if they were a musician, they could post their songs on it and get people to listen as soon as they finished recording a song. As a concept, I liked the enthusiasm… and naiveté. The problem with that idea was that if there was no record label, how do you know which of the hundreds of thousands or millions of websites to check out? You could spend all day just looking for sites and sampling music. If you have no job, that sounds like fun but for other people that doesn’t seem practical. Now, I’m not a fan of record labels underpaying artists, keeping their copyrights, dropping them after one flop and muzzling their creativity, but I did like the fact that labels acted as a filter for the crap bands and songs and tried to promote what they felt people would like, and buy. If you didn’t like Warner Brothers’ mainstream pop acts you would buy stuff from the Sub Pop or Wax Trax labels. Nowadays, who knows where you should go, especially for undiscovered bands. Yeah, you can check out the music credits for teen-skewing shows like Gossip Girl, 90210 or Life Unexpected. You could listen to iTunes commercials or you could scour blogs and websites. Or you could just listen to me.

For the last ten years or so, I’ve been compiling a mix CD of my favorite songs of each year. Up until now I’ve just been sending the CD to some friends each year and have never put my opinions out into the wider blogosphere. Of course, the number of people reading this blog is probably much smaller than my circle of friends, which just confirms my record label lament above about the difficulty of finding a reliable source of good music. Still, I like the concept of sharing my favorites with other people so I’m posting the tracking listing for my 2009 CD and for the first time I’ll include some commentary about each track. This was inspired by Juliana Hatfield, who posted a song-by-song commentary about her newest CD. Granted it was four months in advance of the CD, which comes out this month, so I have no idea if the comments provide any insight into the songs but I like the idea of explaining why I enjoy a particular song. (Plus, I just did the blog-buzz thing and talked up an artist I like. I’m sure Juliana Hatfield will now become a major star- the next Colbie Caillat or Lily Allen.) So here are the songs I liked the most for 2009 (or at least the 22 songs that could fit onto the CD) followed by a list of my favorite albums of the year, the most disappointing albums, and all the CDs I listened to this year. So now you have an idea of what you should be listening to, at least according to my eclectic and sometimes questionable taste. Welcome to the new age of music promotion!

Little Boots- New In Town: After seeing this British singer Little Boots raved about in lots of music magazines, I downloaded a song using a free song credit that I had. I was enchanted from the first few seconds. (Since it is a British singer, I can use the word ‘enchanted’ in the description without sounding excessively fey.) The sound is a bit fuzzed out for a pop song and the chorus is a kind of chant-like. It reminded me a bit of Kylie Minogue and you can never hear too much Kylie, even if it isn’t really Kylie. I then bought the whole album and realized I had been subject to a little bait-and-switch. The first two songs, New In Town and Earthquake, were the only ones in the electro-pop style. The rest a more typical pop style songs but I liked them as well. Neither this song nor any others on the album were big hits in the U.S. although several should have been. I found myself humming the chorus to Mathematics and Symmetry for days and even weeks after hearing them. I started the CD with this one because it was unusual and fun but also because it couldn’t possibly follow the next song.

Yeah Yeah Yeahs- Zero: This song was mind-blowing. It was totally original, catchy and offbeat. You have likely heard this song on the radio so I don’t need to go into a lot of depth discussing it. I was surprised though that I liked it because I absolutely hated Maps, the Yeah Yeah Yeahs big breakthrough. It was dull and downbeat and ballad-y. So when it was on lots of critics best-of-the-year lists, I figured I’d never need to buy anything from the YYYs. Kind of the same way I figured I’d never need to buy any Coldplay after hearing the whiny, drippy boring song Yellow. But then Coldplay put out Speed Of Sound and a couple other good songs so I bought Viva La Vida and liked it and the YYYs put out Zero and I bought their album. For once, an acclaimed album deserves the praise. Zero was a great song and so were several others, like Heads Will Roll and Dragon Queen. This song is also proof that I’m not drawn to music by female performers because of their looks. I think Karen O is a bit gawky and plain. She’s no Tyler Swift. Then again, Tyler isn’t a real glamour-puss either. She looks like a cute vampire, or maybe Renee Zellwegger’s kid sister.

Lady Gaga- Summer Boy: By now everyone knows about Lady Gaga and has heard her big hits. When I do my CD, I don’t usually put on the big hits because everyone has already heard them and already gotten sick of them. I want to put on things that are good but mostly unknown so you can discover something new and exciting. This isn’t a “greatest hits” CD. It’s a “best of” CD, and that’s an important distinction. Sometimes the big hits suck and other songs are much more artistically successful. In this case though, I also loved her hits but I’m sick of hearing them right now so I declare a moratorium on them. Also I’m a bit irritated that she had four number one songs from the album- Poker Face, Just Dance, Paparazzi and Love Game. Lady Gaga has now had more number one songs than the Kinks. Does that seem fair? Think of all the great songs the Kinks have had- Lola, All Day And All Of The Night, Come Dancing, You Really Got Me, Sunny Afternoon. Guess how many of those hit # 1? Zero. Their biggest hit was the # 6 showing for Come Dancing.

That means Lady Gaga has an infinitely greater amount of #1s than the Kinks. That itself isn’t so bad since I like several of her songs and it’s okay that Madonna has 13 #1 songs, including the awful “Music”, but it also means that Milli Vanilli has more chart-toppers than the Kinks and that isn’t right. According to the public, “Blame It On the Rain” is better than “Tired Of Waiting For You” or “State Of Confusion”. Whitesnake has a number one song. Whitesnake. When they come up for eligibility in the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame, do you think the geniuses behind “Slow & Easy” and “Here I Go Again” will get voted in? No but they can claim they were bigger than the Kinks. Some other performers with a number one song are Jennifer Lopez (She has 4! Can you name any of them? Do you like more than two of them?), Puff Daddy (5), Bare Naked Ladies, Rick Dees (you know, “Disco Duck”), Bon Jovi (5), Sheena Easton, The Escape Club, Guns N Roses, Heart, Wham/George Michael (10 #1s. Yes, 10.), The Monkees (3), New Kids On The Block (3) and Michael Sembello (Who? Oh- the theme from Flashdance.) Speaking of The Who, their biggest hit was the #9 “I Can See For Miles”. Even though their SuperBowl show didn’t prove it, they deserve better too. (So did the Colts. That onsides kick by the Saints was an announcement that they couldn’t play the Colts straight up. They had to resort to sanctioned cheating.) “The Macarena” has spent more weeks at number one than The Kinks and The Who combined. Now you know why I sometimes weep spontaneously. It’s The Macarena and what it says about our country. I could live with it if it was just Whitesnake or the Monkees. At least The Monkees had songs written by Neil Diamond and Carole King.

That’s just from randomly flipping through my Top 40 hits book. No wonder some people argue that rock is dead. Heck, Jessica Simpson has a number three hit song so she also was more successful than the Kinks. Sigh… Luckily these days, I just pay attention to the music and not the charts otherwise I’d really get dejected. The public is good about finding some stupid hit and then repeating it until no one wants to hear it anymore. Have you listened to “Who Let The Dogs Out” lately? That’s why I put Summer Boy on this CD. You’ve heard all Gaga’s hits but not this breezy, fun little ditty from her debut album. It’s totally unlike her hits, which sound a bit robotic and edgy. I doubt you will ever hear it on the radio now because radio programmers are onto her next album, the Fame Monster EP which also has some good things. So no, I didn’t put on Just Dance or Poker Face, which are good songs but you know those by heart. Let’s give some other song a chance. I also have a feeling that next year I will be saying the same thing about Fame Monster’s song “Teeth”. Also, while I have your attention, go buy a Kinks greatest hits album. Something that covers them from the 60’s thru the 80’s.

Dean Martin- I Will: As soon as I got over the fact that Columbia House Records folded despite my two decades of my monetary support, the BMG music club decided to go belly-up as well. No more “8 CDs for a penny!” Before it folded though, I had a chance to redeem some of my accumulated points for free CDs. There weren’t too many things left to get that that I didn’t already own though so for the heck of it, I got a Dean Martin collection. I wanted to see if he deserved to be famous for something other than being Jerry Lewis’ movie foil or the drunken guy from Cannonball Run. I was impressed. The album had some good stuff. Of course the first song on the collection was That’s Amore, a song I hate (You know it. The lyrics are “When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that’s amore.”). From there though, it got a lot better, with Ain’t That A Kick In The Head, Mambo Italiano, Sway and the song included here- I Will. He gives an earnest, yearning performance that melts your heart. You know it has to be a great song because it’s a ballad and I like it.

Tony Orlando- To Wait For Love: I finally got the Burt Bacharach box set. It had been out for about eight years but I couldn’t convince myself to get it until now because it was $50 and most of the songs were things I had already but in versions by different people. See, Burt is mainly a songwriter. Every now and then, he’ll do the singing himself but it’s pretty excruciating when he does. It’s much better to hear Dionne Warwick sing “Walk On By” or have Tom Jones do “What’s New Pussycat”. His songs are so good though that lots of people have covered them. Think of the song I Just Don’t Know What To Do With Myself. What do you consider the definite version? The first person to perform it? That would be Tommy Hunt. The one who had the biggest success with it? That’s Jackie Deshannon. The one who had the most fun with it? That’s Cameron Diaz doing a karaoke version in My Best Friend’s Wedding. Others who covered it are Dionne Warwick, Elvis Costello and Smokey Robinson. How’s that for diversity? I finally found the box set on a used CD website for about $20 so I snapped it up. Some of the songs are revelations. As much as I’ve been talking up Bacharach, he had even more good songs than I realized. Who’d have thought that I’d love a Gene Pitney song or a Tony Orlando song that didn’t involve tying yellow ribbons or knocking three times? I never knew Orlando was a crooner. The lyrics are what get me though- it’s like he’s singing directly to me “To wait for love is just to waste your life away.” I’m feeling that way a lot these days. Yes, it’s a ballad but it’s about emotion, not about vocal gymnastics, and the lyrics by Hal David are touching although I’m not so fond of having Tony Orlando sing to me to “press your lips to mine”. Still, great song, great performance.

Burt Bacharach- Don't Go Breaking My Heart: I just love the tempo and mood of this song. Burt knows how to convey longing and heartbreak better than just about anyone. Burt can make heartache sound breathtakingly gorgeous, like he does on this song- one of the rare one’s he sang himself and done well on. As a kid, a Bacharach/David song actually gave me suicidal thoughts. In third grade, when I first heard “Windows Of The World” during the school play (I was “Soldier # 2”) the mood of the song and the bleakness of the lyrics made me wonder what was the point of life if there is so much heartbreak and sorrow ahead of me. Luckily, I got over that but ever since then, just thinking about the chorus “The windows of the world are covered with rain, where is the sunshine we once knew?” depresses me. That song was on this set and I listened to it and got depressed again. Luckily, the rest of the songs were less dangerous. I wept, I laughed and I hummed along through all three CDs and just wished there was more I could get. All three of these last songs are retro songs but they are good and deserve to be heard, even if they are “old.” It’s not like I was listening to these as a kid or teenager so it’s the old guy getting defensive about music from “my days”. Good music needs to be heard. Just don’t play it for third graders- they might not be able to handle it yet.

Matthew Sweet & Susanna Hoffs- You're So Vain: I think these two feel the same way I do. Sweet and Hoffs (from the Bangles) have now done two collections of songs from the 60’s and 70’s. The first one covered lesser-known 60’s gems and this one covers 70’s songs. I don’t like this collection as much as the first. This one has more popular tunes, with fewer unknown treasures, so it was more of a karaoke album because they were fairly faithful to the original songs. I think the biggest problem was that I wanted different vocals on the songs. If a guy did the vocals on the original, I wanted Susanna Hoffs to sing on the cover. If it was a female singer, than Matthew Sweet should have done it. That would give a different take to the song and open it up a bit more. I especially didn’t want to hear Sweet sing on Hello It’s Me because he can’t do better than Todd Rundgren did- his voice isn’t good enough and he doesn’t do a radical revision of the arrangement. Hoffs would have brought something more interesting to it. If I was him though, I would want to do the lead vocals too because it is such a good song. The song I’m putting on this CD does violate this preference but Hoffs’ vocals give it an interesting sound and makes me momentarily forget about Carly Simon. I hope they do another Under The Covers album but would that be an 80’s album? What lost treasures could they pull from that era?

The Sleepy Jackson- You Needed More: I got their last album because I’d heard a great song on a compilation CD. When Tower Records was going out of business, their prices got marked down every week or two during their sell-off phase. I went to two different locations a couple of times to buy stuff and during their final month, I could pick up almost anything still in stock for about $3. For that price, I could take a chance on a lot of stuff so I picked up this album even though the previous one only had a couple good songs. Just this song alone was worth the price though. It’s quirky, moody and totally absorbs you. It doesn’t sound like anything on the radio right now. You are immersed in the sound. There are several other good songs on the Personality album as well. This is the stunner though.

John Legend- Satisfaction: I’ve used the word “mood” several times already when describing a song and here’s another one where it applies. John Legend is a smooth singer but his best songs work because of the songwriting and the atmosphere of the songs rather than his singing. The delivery of his words is more important than the technical aspects of the voice. Of course, he is talking about sex and romance, like he does in pretty much every song of his, but the way he sings it would seduce anyone.

Amy MacDonald- Mr. Rock & Roll: I heard this song on my XM/Sirius radio before the cigarette lighter power supply died and I went back commercial radio. I like the tempo of it- a jaunty mid-tempo- and the lyrics are a nice scathing examination of fame and narcissism. The rest of the album is more folk-y but on this song and two others, the style really works.

Beyonce- Single Ladies: Okay, here’s a big hit, finally. Even though I want to highlight undiscovered songs here, I had to put this on here because I love this song and so does everyone else in all of America. You couldn’t escape this song even though it came out last year. Not only was it all over the radio, it was in Glee and about a dozen other television shows and movies. It still sticks in my head each time I hear it, kind of a female version of Gnarls Barkley’s Crazy. A great beat. Stupid lyrics but an infectious beat. I was going to follow this song with an old one by Was (Not Was) called “Shake Your Head” because it had equally stupid lyrics and the tempo of the song was comparable to Beyonce. Unfortunately, when I decided on the final CD track listing, it was four seconds longer than the 80 minutes of space available so something had to go. I deleted Was (Not Was) because it was a kitschy fun song rather than a hidden gem. It’s the same reason I didn’t include Men Without Hat’s Safety Dance even though I’ve been grooving to it all year. I still encourage you to listen to both of those songs though.

Franz Ferdinand- No You Girls: You don’t really need both these guys and the Killers- just do a combined album. They always put out albums around the same time as each other and their singles are often indistinguishable from each other. Quick- which of them did Ulysses and which did Spaceman? If you put together the best songs from each, you would have one excellent album instead of two okay albums. It’s not just them either. I had this same thought several times this year when I was listening to box sets and compilations from Poco, America, Steely Dan and Crosby, Stills & Nash. Aside from their hit singles they song exactly alike. I have no idea how that is possible because if you hear a Steely Dan song like Peg or The Fez, it sounds nothing like Horse With No Name or Ventura Highway by America. The singles have such a distinct sound. If you put on some of the album tracks though, like America’s Muskrat Love or Poco’s Indian Summer, they sound exactly like an album cut on a Steely Dan album. I never would have guessed that Steely Dan could have sounded like CS&N. Not only that, they aren’t very memorable either. There is a reason you don’t know many America songs that weren’t hits. The non-hits are pleasant muddles that sound like half-finished songs. I guess that explains why some bands are mostly known as singles artists- they can’t find the magic in every song. Franz Ferdinand found it on this one though- a throbbing, effervescent song.

Placebo- For What It's Worth: Placebo is one of my favorite bands but they only do an album every three or four years so I have high expectations every time they release something. The last one was pretty weak, for them, so it was nice to see that this new one was a bit of a comeback. This song is not a cover of the Buffalo Springfield song, by the way. It’s a driving change of pace for them. Whereas in the past, a lot of their songs worked because of their mood or an interesting guitar part, this one works because of the melody. They don’t go for their normal cacophonous drone and instead they write some catchy songs. You could actually (Dare I say it?) dance to some of these songs. It might be a bit of a mosh rather than a swing dance but for Placebo, that is a radical move. There are five or six comparable songs on the album. I am a bit disappointed that they stole a lyric from Juliana Hatfield though- “A heart that hurts is a heart that works”- and uses it as the basis for a whole song, but aside from that I was quite pleased with the album and this song in particular. Also, for this compilation CD, we are no longer in the past. The last few things have been fresh new songs and the rock stuff instead of the pop stuff. Which leads to…

Muse- Starlight: I actually heard this two years ago and kept waiting for either a follow-up song or for the album to be cheap enough to buy for possibly one song. I finally caved in this year after their next album came out. The rest of the album is good but this is the best song on it. There isn’t much to say about the song- it is a straightforward rock & roll song that lodges itself in your brain.

U2- Magnificent: I feel bad for U2. They are a great band and have done a lot of stuff I love but I wasn’t a fan of their latest album. It was too downbeat, too slow and not very memorable. It sounded like background music for when I did laundry rather than anthemic music for changing the world, which is what they usually deliver. I know they tried for something different here and I’ll admit that I didn’t “get” the album, partly because I don’t usually look at the lyrics too closely, but this particular song was worth excavating from the muddle. It has a good Edge guitar part, a melody worth singing along to and a good message as well.

The Lemonheads- Waiting Around To Die: This is a complete change of pace for the Lemonheads (just Evan Dando for the most part). You could perform this album in a coffeehouse with an acoustic guitar, drummer and backup singer but it works. All the songs are covers but you probably haven’t heard any of them before unless you are a fan of disparate cult favorites like GG Allin and Leonard Cohen. Sometimes you need to cleanse the palate of all the over-produced, Auto-Tuned songs on the airwaves. A lot of the songs on this collection sound like murder ballads so not only is the sound different, the lyrics are too. The Lemonheads are ready to start a new phase hopefully. Their last period was the “after Juliana Hatfield” phase, which came after their successful period- the “Juliana Hatfield” phase of three of four albums she appeared on. I don’t know if Dando can still write a good song though- this covers album is a dodge- showing his musical rather than his writing skills.

M Ward- Never Had Nobody Like You: I loved the She & Him album from last year and since Ward’s latest solo album got good reviews, I decided to buy it. It didn’t hurt that Zooey Deschanel also appears on one of the songs. This one in fact. It sounds like a lost track from She & Him. The rest of the album is just as good although slightly different in style- more like a 50’s rockabilly album. Now I might have to get the Monsters Of Folk album to see what else he can do. Full disclosure- I did buy the She & Him album originally because I adore Zooey Deschanel. She only plays three characters (1- Quirky romantic interest, 2- Spaced out, wide eyed prop, 3- Sarcastic, spunky best friend) but she nails them all, even though I hate character # 2 (for an example, see The Happening). So in this case I did get a female performers album because I liked the girl and the girl’s looks, but I’m glad I did it because it was an amazing and offbeat album, an anti-Britney album. If you like the M Ward song, get the She & Him album too.

Dandy Warhols- Now You Love Me: I think all my favorite artists have staged artistic comebacks this year. The Warhols had been in a slump lately but they finally started playing to their strengths and returning to their signature sound. I don’t need them to change styles- who needs another band that sound like Poco and Steely Dan album cuts? I need them to do what they do best- droning, groove-oriented rock. They find the essence of the song and play it until they’ve done everything they can do with it. I hope they build on this success for their next album instead of some other bizarre detour, like teaming up with Nick Taylor of Duran Duran. I love Duran Duran as well as the Dandys but the two didn’t go well together. That album had two good songs (the phenomenal “We Used To Be Friends” and the very good “Last High”) but the rest besmirched the names of both parties. This song, along with Mission Control, Wasp In The Lotus and Welcome To The Third World, has me holding my breathe for the next album. It’s going to be a long three or four years.

Weezer- The Girl Got Hot: They are still coasting from the magnificence (I suddenly hear the U2 song in my head) of their 3rd and fourth albums (the green one and Maladroit) but this is one of the highlights on their seventh album. The lyrics are stupid- typical Weezer in other words- but with a nice crunchy sound to it- typical Weezer in other words. When they are on, they really cook. This particular dish has extra spice. Now that Rivers Cuomo cracked his ribs in a bus accident, I’m not sure they will be putting out anything new anytime soon. See, that’s the reason I listen to so many different things in terms of style and quantity. If I liked only a few artists, I only get new albums every two years or so (Except Prince who does two a year it seems.) After I’ve played them to death, I would either have to stop listening to music or try something else. So maybe David Bowie hasn’t done anything in the last three years, but the “Bowie-approved” Placebo did. While I’m waiting for Interpol to get their shit together (What’s up with that last crap album?) I can listen to something similar like the Dandy Warhols. Life’s too short to limit your playlist to the 100 songs you loved in college.

Bootsy Collins- Play With Bootsy: Since I love Parliament Funkadelic, when I saw this in Tower for $3 I had to get it. Playing this song, the title track, I thought this was a reissue of an album from the 1970’s or 80’s but while listening to it I thumbed through the liner notes and saw some recent artists appearing on it. Turns out it is a 2002 album. It sounds like a throwback, definitely. Quite funky, which is what I was hoping for. This track also continues the faster pace of Muse and Weezer after the folk leaning songs of M Ward and the Lemonheads and the guitars are groovier so it helps the transition to the next song.

Ladyhawke- Dusk Till Dawn: I totally took a flyer on this one. I had only heard some general hype about this artist but the reviews on Amazon made it sound like the type of thing I might like, assuming the songs actually matched up with the descriptions from the reviews. On my first play-thru of the album, each song started out really weird. The intro starts out sounding like a cover of some 80’s artist, like Cyndi Lauper or Depeche Mode but then Ladyhawke (a solo female artist) strips the beat down to the basics and takes off from there, making the intro riff into a song of her own that might be slightly reminiscent of an earlier song but is totally distinct. For instance, when you listen to this song, see if the opening reminds you of Frankie Goes To Hollywood’s “Relax”. It totally does but after about 30 seconds the song mutates into something completely different. I ended up putting five of her songs on my monthly mix CD. I picked this one for the year’s compilation because it’s the one that lodged in my brain the deepest. I love how the chorus is awkwardly phrased but still insanely catchy.

Tom Jones- If He Should Ever Leave You: I love the percussion on this and the brass too- sounds just like some of the Burt Bacharach hits even though this was done 40 years later. Not enough songs these days use brass. Done properly, it sounds terrific and adds an interesting layer of sound. The production makes this sound retro even (though this was done last year) but it still sounds amazing. The drumming is the backbone the song is built on. It charges right at you and keeps pounding away but it’s a middleweight attack, not a Dave Grohl, John Bonham sledge-hammer heavyweight sound. It’s more agile and nimble and allows Tom Jones to weave his vocals around the tune. The brass adds a punctuating flourish to the whole thing. Tom has a good time with this and adds to his collection of great performances. Once it is done I want to start it over and play it again. Then I want to go listen to more Tom Jones. He remains vital, with some songs that sound like Burt Bacharach then others that sound like modern day R&B o0r dance-pop. I remain amazed by Tom Jones. Frank Sinatra and Tony Bennett may have gotten the cool cache from the media but Tom is still blowing the roof off the barn. Not only that, after 40 years in the business, he hasn’t started coasting. He puts out CDs that are interesting and modern. Last album he worked with Wyclef Jean and he actually co-wrote his songs. This time he continued that trend and collaborates with Bono and others, to make what are quintessential Tom Jones songs. Heck, how can you not love a guy who has his own theme song (“Tom Jones International”)? This throwback song is a fun way to finish this collection. It also brings things full-circle since I’ve talked a lot about older music. Here’s modern music that sounds old.

If anyone wants a copy of the CD, let me know and I’ll send you one. In fact, I have the yearly CDs from the last five years still sitting on my shelves. I hadn’t sent them out because I was going to do it in conjunction with my Year In Review booklet, which is long overdue. The last booklet was in 2004. I was going to do a 2005 thru 2009 cumulative one but I’m a bit behind on that and keep getting diverted by my blog (or work or movies or poker or social outings, etc…etc…). So if you want the CDs from prior years too, let me know and tell me where to send them. There are a couple of other songs that were good enough to go on this year’s CD but couldn’t due to time constraints so let me just mention those real quickly: Robyn- Dream On, Silversun Pickups- Panic Switch, Kanye West- Paranoid, Miley Cyrus- See You Again, Tears For Fears- Raoul And The Kings Of Spain, Phoenix- Fences, Sam Phillips- No Explanations, Most Serene Republic- Heavens To Purgatory, Dragonette- Pick up The Phone, Ace Frehley- Genghis Khan, Hockey- Work and Placebo- Ashtray Heart.

Now that I’ve talked about some of my favorite individual songs let me get into my favorite and my most disappointing full-length albums for the year. These are all things I listened to this year, not necessarily things were released this year. That’s why there are some old albums too. Also, these are in order by preference with the # 1 album being my favorite (or most disappointing) of the year. However, for the top seven or so, I kept going back and forth so if I happened to listen to number 6 again, I might rank it as the top since I heard it most recently. Just to clarify, an album on the most disappointing list doesn’t mean it’s horrible. It is likely a mediocre album but considering some of the artists involved or the hype behind the album, the end result was a massive let-down from what they are capable of. As of now, here are the lists:

Richard’s 20 Favorite Albums Of 2009

20) Tears For Fears- Raoul & Kings Of Spain
19) John Legend- Evolver
18) The Kinks- Ultimate Collection
17) Phoenix- Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix
16) Jack Off Jill- Sexless Demons And Scars
15) Robyn- Robyn
14) Lemonheads- Varshons
13) Dean Martin- Dino: Essential Dean Martin
12) Per Gessle- Party Crasher
11) The Sleepy Jackson- Personality
10) Yeah Yeah Yeahs- It’s Blitz
9) Black Eyed Peas- The E.N.D
8) Matthew Sweet & Susanna Hoffs- Under The Covers, Vol. 2
7) Dandy Warhols- Earth To The Dandys
6) Lady Gaga- The Fame
5) M Ward- Hold Time
4) Little Boots- Hands
3) Placebo- Battle For The Sun
2) Tom Jones- 24 Hours
1) Ladyhawke- Ladyhawke

Richard’s 10 Most Disappointing Albums

10) The Dials- Flex Time
9) Ice-T- Gangsta Rap
8) Imogen Heap- Speak For Yourself
7) Scarling- Sweet Heart Dealer
6) Catfish Haven- Tell Me
5) Fall Out Boy- Folie A Deux
4) Prince- Lotus Flower/MPL Sound/ Bria
3) Jarvis Cocker- Record
2) Ladytron- Velocifer
1) Nine Inch Nails- Year Zero


I have listened to quite a few other albums this year that fell somewhere in the middle of the pack so just for the sake of completion, I’m going to list everything I listened to this year. They are grouped into various categories so you know why I got them and have some idea if they are awful or not.

I Buy Anything They Do
Cult, The Born Into This (2007)
Dandy Warhols, The- Earth To The Dandy Warhols (2008)
Dave Stewart- Dave Stewart Songbook (2008)
David Bowie- Man Who Sold The World (1969)
Ice-T- Gangsta Rap (1996)
Kylie Minogue- Boombox: Remix Album 2000-2008 (2009)
Placebo- Battle For The Sun (2009)
Prince- Lotus Flower/MPL Sound/Bria Valente (2009)
Radiohead- In Rainbows (2008)
Revolting Cocks- Cocktail Mixx (2007); Sex-O Olympico (2009)
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss - Raising Sand (2007)
Tom Jones- 24 Hours (2008)
U2- Best Of 1990-2000 & B-Sides (2002); No Line On The Horizon (2009)
Various Artists- Bee Gees Songbook (2004)
Weezer- Raditude (2009)

I Loved The Last Album/Love The Current Single So Let’s Risk It Again
Amy McDonald- This Is The Life (2007)
Ben Folds- Way To Normal (2008)
Black Eyed Peas, The- The E.N.D. (2009)
Jill Cuniff- City Beach (2007)
De Novo Dahl- Move Every Muscle Make Every Sound (2007)
Foo Fighters- Echoes, Silence, Patience & Grace (2007)
Franz Ferdinand- Tonight (2009)
John Legend- Evolver (2008)
Keane- Hopes & Fears (2004); Perfect Symmetry (2008)
Kevin Rudolph- In The City (2008)
Killers, The- Day And Age (2008)
Lemonheads, The- Varshons (2009)
Matthew Sweet- Sunshine Lies (2008)
Matthew Sweet & Susanna Hoffs- Under The Covers Vol. 2 (2009)
Morningwood- Diamonds & Studs (2009)
Muse- Black Holes And Revelations (2006)
Music, The- Strength In Numbers (2008)
Pretty Things, The- Come See Me (Best Of) (2004)
Pussycat Dolls - Doll Domination (2008)
Robyn- Robyn (2008)
Sam Phillips- Don't Do Anything (2008)
Yeah Yeah Yeahs- It's Blitz (2009)

Impulse Purchase (Got positive reviews or was very cheap)
Ace Frehley- Anomaly (2009)
Al Green- Lay It Down (2008)
Belinda Carlisle- Viola (2007)
Bootsy Collins - Playing With Bootsy (2002)
Catfish Haven- Tell Me (2006)
Cobra Verde- Easy Listening (2003)
Creatures, The- Anima Animus (1999)
Cyndi Lauper- Bring Ya To The Brink (2008)
Dan Hartman- Keep The Fire Burnin' (1995)
Dean Martin- Dino- The Essential Dean Martin (2004)
Dials, The- Flex Time (2005)
DMX- Definition Of X: Pick Of The Litter (2007)
Duffy- I Love My Friends (1998)
Fall Out Boy- Folie A Deux (2008)
Hockey- Mind Chaos (2009)
Imogen Heap- Speak For Yourself (2005)
Jack Logan- Buzz Me In (1999)
Jack Off Jill- Sexless Demons And Scars (1997); Clear Hearts Grey Flowers (2000)
Lady Gaga- Fame, The (2008)
Ladyhawke- Ladyhawke (2008)
Little Boots- Hands (2009)
Lily Allen- It's Not Me, It's You (2009)
M Ward- Hold Time (2009)
Marnie Stern- This Is It And I Am It And You Are It… (2008)
Olivia Newton John & Friends- A Celebration In Song (2008)
Paul Stanley- Live To Win (2006)
Per Gessle- Party Crasher (2008); En Handig Man (2007); World According To Gessle (1997)
Phoenix- Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix (2009)
Scarling- Sweet Heart Dealer (2003)
September- Dancing Shoes (2007)
Silversun Pickups- Swoon (2009)
Sleepy Jackson, The- Personality (2006)
Sounds, The- Crossing The Rubicon (2009)
Stella Starr- Harmonies For The Haunted (2005)
Tinted Windows- Tinted Windows (2009)
Veronicas, The- Hook Me Up (2007)
Virgins, The- Virgins, The (2008)
Whip, The- X Marks The Destination (2009)

Rounding Out My Collection (“Collect the whole set!”)
ABBA Visitors, The (1981); Voulez-Vous (1979); Waterloo (1974)
Beatles - Anthology #1 (1995)
Bee Gees- 1st (1967)
Benny Anderssons Orkester- BAO (2007)
Berlin w/ Terri Nunn All The Way In (2009) [I wish she would put out new songs though]
Big F, The- Patience Peregrine (EP) (1993)
Billy Joel- Stranger, The (Legacy 2-CD Edition) (1977)
Bob Segar- Greatest Hits Vol. 2 (2003)
Kinks, The- Low Budget (1996); The Ultimate Collection (2002)
Luscious Jackson- Greatest Hits (2007)
Madonna- Celebration (2009)
Marty Balin & Bodacious DF- Bodacious DF (1973)
Ministry- Rantology (2005); Sphinctour (2002); Cover Up (2008); Rio Grande Blood (2006) Moody Blues- Seventh Sojourn (1972); Every Good Boy Deserves Favor (1975); Question Of Balance, A- (1970)
My Bloody Valentine- Loveless (1991)
Offspring, The - Greatest Hits (2005)
Quincy Jones- Big Band Bossanova (1998)
Replacements, The- Hootenany (1983)
Sheila E- Romance 1600 (1985)
Styx- Complete Wooden Nickel Recordings (2005); Styx & Contemporary Youth Orchestra (2006)
Tanya Donnelly- Beauty Sleep (2001)
Tears For Fears- Raoul & The Kings Of Spain (1995); Elemental (1993)
Thompson Twins- Into The Gap (1984)
UB40- Greatest Hits (2008)
Various Artists- New Wave Gold (2007); Rock The First- Vol. Three (1992); Wicked Soundtrack By Al Jourgensen (2008); New Jack Swing Gold (2008); We're A Happy Family- Ramones Tribute (1993); Absolute Music # 51 (2005)
Voodoo Child [Moby]- Baby Monkey (2003)
Was (Not Was)- The Collection (2004)
Yes- Talk (1994)

On Thin Ice (If the next thing suck, I’ll stop buying them)
Jarvis Cocker- Record (2006)
Nine Inch Nails- Year Zero (2007); Every Day Is Exactly The Same (2006)- [This EP was good but Year Zero sucked.]

Never Again (The next thing did suck so no more money from me)
Ladytron- Velocifer (2008)

So this was my year in music for 2009. Did you have any favorites I don’t know about? Let me know- let’s make this peer recommendation thing work.